Secure AI adoption
Engineer AI authority boundaries, egress protection, exchange logging and adversarial evaluation around an agreed customer environment.
Aliph Cyber develops AI security controls around the approved workflow: agent authority, data egress, model exchanges and consequential actions. The engineering scope connects classification, privacy transformations, logging and adversarial evaluation. Arcova supports agreed security operations such as monitoring, triage, response and recovery. Service scope is subject to applicable registration, licensing and contracting requirements.
For security leaders, enterprise architects, data owners and AI programme teams.
Map how information moves from the user through sources, model processing and output. Identify the systems, identities and third parties involved in the proposed design. Review data handling and operating arrangements with the owners responsible for each boundary.
Define each agent’s remit and enforce the approved source and tool permissions. Select privacy transformations for Arabic and English sensitive fields before model processing where required by classification. Review external model paths and egress explicitly, and make human approval specific to the proposed consequential action.
Exercise misuse and failure cases in Arabic, dialect and mixed script where relevant to the scope. Agree the exchange and action records needed for investigation, along with access and retention rules. Connect Aliph’s control engineering with Arcova-supported monitoring, response, remediation validation and recovery exercises.
An internal team plans to extend a knowledge assistant from one department to several. The review maps source permissions, examines what the model receives and tests questions using different user roles. A retrieved document containing an instruction unrelated to the task becomes a test case for the proposed safeguards.
The team records observed behaviour, unresolved findings and decisions about what must change before expansion. This illustrative review produces evidence for the responsible approvers; it does not assume that any particular deployment is already secure.
Map the request from source to model and action. Agree classification, authority, egress and logging requirements, then define the control engineering and operating scope with accountable owners.
Define the task, users and expected benefit. Identify sensitive material, external processing and the consequences of an incorrect response or action.
Map identities, sources, model interactions and tools. Agree security requirements and record the owners of access, data handling and approval decisions.
Exercise representative misuse and failure cases within the authorised scope. Document findings, proposed remediation and the criteria for validating a change.
Confirm residual decisions, operational responsibilities and incident handling. Plan how new integrations, users and model or prompt changes receive appropriate review.
These inputs help turn an initial discussion into a focused scope.
Test source access, misuse scenarios, action permissions and the team’s ability to investigate and recover from a failure.
Explore the relevant product capabilities, then confirm the integrations, configuration and delivery scope for your organisation.
Bring ERP, CRM, policies and organisational memory into one conversation. AliphChat helps your teams understand what is happening, check the information behind the answer and decide what to do next across the business.
Start with the records your governance team already maintains. Agentic Studio prepares assessment, board report and regulatory submission drafts, giving reviewers the evidence, open questions and approval path they need to make the report their own.
Bring the workflow, people and implementation together.
Explore Aliph Cyber servicesInclude security when the workflow and its data flows are being defined. Early review helps the team make informed choices about access, processing and actions. Revisit those decisions as the implementation and intended use become more concrete.
Hosting is one part of the design. The assessment also needs to consider user permissions, source access, application behaviour, output handling and operational response. Review the complete workflow against the organisation’s requirements.
The agreed scope can include source-access boundaries, untrusted input, unsupported output and unintended actions. Define the test environment and authorisation before work begins, and select scenarios that reflect the consequences of failure in the intended task.
Record the finding, business consequence, owner and proposed treatment. The responsible decision-maker should understand the remaining exposure and the conditions for proceeding. A review should make that decision clearer rather than imply a blanket guarantee.
Tell us about your current process, intended users and requirements. We’ll help define a first implementation and a practical way to evaluate it.
Start a conversation