Governance & assurance
Connect governance inventory, policy gaps, enterprise risks, indicators, controls and assurance through one reviewed evidence lifecycle.
Aliph GRC implements governance in software on customer-approved infrastructure. A common evidence lifecycle connects requirements, risks, controls, tests, findings, actions and reporting. Policy Vault manages the governance inventory and document lifecycle, while Aliph Risk & Compliance provides the core register and Enterprise Risk capability. Named owners review the evidence and accept decisions.
For governance, compliance, risk, internal assurance and policy teams.
Use Policy Vault to inventory and classify governance documents, map relationships and identify coverage gaps. Connect draft, review, approval, publishing and attestation with named owners. Readiness views support the review of evidence and outstanding work; they do not establish a certification.
Establish the risk taxonomy, impact and likelihood scales, appetite and relevant KRIs and KCIs. Connect incidents, control effectiveness, assessments and actions to the core register. Heat maps and assurance views reflect the agreed methodology and supporting records.
Follow a requirement through the relevant risks, controls, tests, findings and actions. Define closure evidence and the route for overdue decisions. Agentic Studio can draft assessments and board reporting from governed register records, with named owners reviewing the material before approval.
A governance team reviews a periodic user-access control. The control owner supplies the review record, an assessor identifies accounts requiring follow-up and the team records a finding with a responsible action owner. A reviewer checks the supporting material before accepting closure.
The walkthrough tests whether each participant can complete their step, whether the evidence supports the recorded decision and whether an overdue action reaches the right person. Reviewers use the findings to refine the proposed workflow.
Choose one policy, risk or assurance cycle. Agree the document inventory, risk methodology, register relationships and named review authorities before configuring the workflow.
Choose one policy, assessment or assurance cycle. Document the current records, decisions, participants and handoffs before selecting what to configure.
Define the relationships between obligations, policies, risks, controls and evidence within scope. Confirm ownership, review authority and meaningful status values.
Implement the agreed registers and approval steps. Use a representative case to test rejected evidence, reassigned ownership and an overdue action.
Confirm reporting responsibilities, review calendars and data maintenance. Give owners a clear method for changing the workflow as the operating model evolves.
These inputs help turn an initial discussion into a focused scope.
Review whether owners can complete their work, reviewers can follow the evidence and unresolved actions reach the right decision-maker.
Explore the relevant product capabilities, then confirm the integrations, configuration and delivery scope for your organisation.
Know what is approved, where coverage is missing and who needs to act. Policy Vault connects your governance inventory to review, publication and attestation, so the policy stays connected to the people responsible for it.
Bring risk appetite, control performance and assurance into one connected view. Aliph Risk & Compliance helps teams explain the exposure, follow the evidence and put the next action in the right hands across the institution.
Bring the workflow, people and implementation together.
Explore Aliph GRC servicesNo. Begin with the process where disconnected records create the most difficulty. During discovery, identify what should be retained, connected or migrated. The implementation scope should make the authoritative record and its owner clear.
A system can organise records, responsibilities and review decisions. Your accountable teams still determine which requirements apply, assess the evidence and approve conclusions. The engagement should define the process and responsibilities needed to support that work.
Use the current assessment criteria, approval roles and reporting requirements as design inputs. Where terminology or handoffs are unclear, resolve them with the process owner before configuration and validate the result with a representative case.
Choose measures connected to the workflow: completeness of ownership, evidence quality, time spent resolving a review question and visibility of outstanding actions. Record a baseline and use the same definitions when reviewing the first cycle.
Tell us about your current process, intended users and requirements. We’ll help define a first implementation and a practical way to evaluate it.
Start a conversation