Proposal management
Explore a controlled RFP workflow from intake and qualification through response drafting, coverage, pricing review, submission approval and outcome learning.
The Pursuit & Proposal Intelligence product preview connects the RFP pack to a controlled response workflow. Extract and confirm the requirement matrix, qualify the opportunity, draft sections and review coverage and pricing. Named reviewers approve commitments and retain export and submission authority. Outcome learning provides context for the next pursuit.
For pursuit leaders, proposal managers, subject-matter experts and review teams.
Organise the tender documents, amendments, response instructions and important dates. Extract candidate requirements for human confirmation, retaining the source reference and relevant context. Separate mandatory requirements from interpretation questions that need a qualification or clarification decision.
Assign sections to owners and bring approved reference material into the drafting process. Distinguish reusable evidence from assumptions and proposed commitments. Keep the people who understand delivery, commercial terms and the customer need involved in the relevant review decisions.
Review confirmed requirements against response sections and supporting evidence. Bring pricing and refinement decisions through the assigned commercial review. Record who approves exceptions, authorises export and submits the response. Capture the outcome and approved learning points for subsequent pursuits.
A proposal manager receives an enterprise services tender with separate technical and operating requirements. The team confirms a requirement matrix, assigns response sections and uses approved project descriptions to prepare drafts. An amendment changes a delivery requirement, prompting a review of the affected sections and assumptions.
The evaluation checks whether the changed requirement can be traced to its responses, whether every mandatory item has an owner and whether reviewers can identify commitments that still need approval. The scenario uses an illustrative tender.
Use a representative tender to explore the Pursuit product preview. Confirm the requirement matrix, qualification and pricing decisions, response coverage and the authority needed for export or submission.
Understand intake, qualification, drafting and approval using a representative completed tender. Identify where ownership, evidence or requirement coverage became difficult to follow.
Agree requirement types, section ownership and review gates. Select the reference material that may support a response and record how commitments are approved.
Run the workflow against a representative tender, including an amendment, a missing reference and a requirement the organisation cannot currently satisfy.
Prepare contributor guidance, pricing and coverage checks, export authority and ownership for reusable content. Capture the outcome and review which learning points should inform the next pursuit.
These inputs help turn an initial discussion into a focused scope.
Check requirement coverage, unresolved questions and reviewer effort against a representative tender and your current process.
Explore the relevant product capabilities, then confirm the integrations, configuration and delivery scope for your organisation.
Bring ERP, CRM, policies and organisational memory into one conversation. AliphChat helps your teams understand what is happening, check the information behind the answer and decide what to do next across the business.
Give your bid team a clear path from the RFP pack to an approved response. Explore a product preview that keeps confirmed requirements, drafting, pricing and coverage review connected to the people authorised to commit.
Bring the workflow, people and implementation together.
Explore Aliph AI servicesThe scope centres on reviewed intake, drafting and coordination. Contributors remain responsible for factual accuracy and authorised reviewers approve commitments. Submission permissions and any external actions must be explicitly agreed; they are not assumed.
Identify document sensitivity, intended users and permitted processing arrangements during discovery. Confirm access and hosting requirements before loading material. The proposed workflow should show where tender content and response drafts will be used.
Select content that is still approved, accurate and relevant. Record its owner and the circumstances in which it may be reused. Past wording should be treated as a starting point for review, especially when scope or commitments have changed.
Use a representative tender to assess requirement coverage, source traceability, unresolved questions and reviewer effort. Agree the baseline and acceptance criteria with the proposal team before the pilot so useful progress can be distinguished from fluent drafting.
Tell us about your current process, intended users and requirements. We’ll help define a first implementation and a practical way to evaluate it.
Start a conversation